Reviewing Employee Work Objectives From Compensation, Facilities and Work Environment, The Affect.

  • Hendrajaya Hendrajaya STIEPARI Semarang
  • Syamsul Hadi STIEPARI Semarang
  • Henry Yuliamir STIEPARI Semarang
  • Dyah Palupiningtyas STIEPARI Semarang
  • Samtono Samtono STIEPARI Semarang
Keywords: Facilities, Work Environment, Employees, Job Satisfication, Compensation

Abstract

There are still employee complaints that the compensation is not consistent with the concept of justice, the existing facilities at the research site are insufficient to perform community service duties, the facilities that require quantity and quality improvements. This study aims to prove the effect of compensation, facilities, and work environment on the job satisfaction of environmental employees in Kendal Regency. This study design is a descriptive study employed by quantitative analysis using SPSS version 17.0 for the Windows application. This study investigates the relationships between three independent effects — compensation (X1), facilities (X2), and work environment (X3) — and one dependent variable — job satisfaction (Y) with Approximately 114 Kendal Regency Environmental employees asministrated by the questionnaire to the respondents. The results show that there is a positive and significant effect of compensation, facilities, and work environment on the job satisfaction of Kendal Regency Environmental employees. The work environment is the variable that most dominantly influences the increase in job satisfaction of Kendal Regency Environmental employees because it has the highest beta value.

References

Akhmad Subekti, Mohammad Jauhari. 2012. Pengantar Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka
Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2001. Evaluasi Kinerja. Bandung: Refika Aditama
Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2005. Perilaku dan Budaya Organisasi, Bandung: Refika Aditama
Ardana, I Komang, dkk. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta
Dimyati, Hamdan. 2014. Model Kepemimpinan dan Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan. Bandung : Pustaka Setia
Hartatik, Indah Puji. 2014. Buku Praktis Mengembangkan SDM. Yogyakarta : Laksana
Hasibuan. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Kadarisman, M. 2013. Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers
Kartono, Kartini. 2005. Pemimpin Dan Kepemimpinan (cetakan ke-tigabelas). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo
Nasir. Moh. 2009. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
Nuryadin, Asli. 2012. Manajemen Perusahaan. Yogyakarta : Laksbang
Nimalathasan, Balasundaram. 2010. Job Satisfaction And Motivation Of Work Performance: A Case Study Of Individual’s Bank In Jaffna Peninsula, Sri Lanka
Oei Istijanto. 2010. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Pratama, 2012. Pengaruh kompetensi dan motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Indo Stationery Ritel Utama Cabang Samarinda

Putra, 2010. Pengaruh pendidikan dan pelatihan terhadap prestasi kerja karyawan bagian Fixed Phone pada PT. Komunikasi Tbk Denpasar
Rivai Vetizhal, 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan: dari Teori dan Praktik.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Bandung : Alfabeta
Sujarweni, V. Wiratna. 2014. SPSS untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Baru
Tampubolon, Manaham P. 2007. Perilaku Keorganisasian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
Hendrajaya, H., Syamsul Hadi, Henry Yuliamir, Dyah Palupiningtyas, & Samtono, S. (2022). Reviewing Employee Work Objectives From Compensation, Facilities and Work Environment, The Affect. Brilliant International Journal Of Management And Tourism , 2(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.55606/bijmt.v2i2.438