Studi Perbandingan Kompetensi Profesional Guru Indonesia dan Thailand

Authors

  • Shokhibul Mighfar Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Dilfam Aldisya Ervani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Nazilatul Faizah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Anavee Khoona Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Ainun Nisa Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v2i4.3251

Keywords:

Professional Competence, Teacher, Education, Indonesia, Thailand

Abstract

The quality of education is very dependent on the professional competence of teachers. This study aims to compare professional competence between teachers in Indonesia and Thailand. This research uses a qualitative approach, emphasizing comparative descriptive research. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 6 teachers (3 from Indonesia and 3 from Thailand) representing various levels of education. Data analysis was carried out using comparative analysis. The results showed significant differences in professional competence between the two countries. Teachers in Indonesia tend to focus on mastering subject matter and implementing the national curriculum, while teachers in Thailand place more emphasis on developing interpersonal skills, classroom management skills, and the use of technology in learning. Factors that influence these differences include different education systems, educational policies, and the culture and social values of society. This research provides valuable insights for education stakeholders in both countries in designing policies and teacher training programs that meet the demands of the times. In addition, this research also contributes to further understanding of the comparison of education systems and teaching practices between Indonesia and Thailand.

References

Adyatama, R. P. (2013). Penerapan kurikulum pembelajaran IPS di Thailand. Journal of Petrology, 369(1), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kv5wp

Aisyah, N. (2021). 5 negara ASEAN dengan sistem pendidikan terbaik tahun 2021, RI termasuk? https://setnasasean.id/news/read/5-negara-asean-dengan-sistem-pendidikan-terbaik-tahun-2021-ri-termasuk#:~:text=3.%20Thailand, lebih%20tinggi%20dari%20tahun%202020, diakses pada 7 Mei 2024.

Asyarah, W. N., Wulandari, F., Primasti, Y. D., Wijaya, H., & Warman. (2024). Pengembangan standar dan kualitas kompetensi guru profesional melalui program sertifikasi di era revolusi industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 14590–14599. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i1.14459

Azisi, A. M., & Qotrunnada, L. (2021). Analisis kebudayaan dan sistem pendidikan Islam kawasan Asia Tenggara (Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand). Al-Fikr: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.32489/alfikr.v7i2.222

Cahyana, A. (2010). Pengembangan kompetensi profesional guru dalam menghadapi sertifikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 16(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i1.434

Darmadi, H. (2015). Tugas, peran, kompetensi, dan tanggung jawab menjadi guru profesional. Jurnal Edukasi, 13(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v13i2.113

Dudung, A. (2018). Kompetensi profesional guru. JKKP (Jurnal Kesejahteraan Keluarga Dan Pendidikan), 5(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.21009/JKKP.051.02

Elwijaya, F., Mairina, V., & Gistituati, N. (2022). Konsep dasar kebijakan pendidikan. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 16(5), 1921. http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/aq.v16i5.1354

Hayeetahe, N. (2008). Implementasi supervisi kepala sekolah dalam mengembangkan profesionalitas guru (Issue April). http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/id/eprint/4299

Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2013). Evaluasi sistem pendidikan nasional Indonesia. Isqae, 235–244.

Hilmin, D., Noviani, L., & Lisdaleni, M. N. (2023). Pendidikan Islam di Thailand dan Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia (JSII), 1(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.61930/jsii.v1i1.119

Kristiawan, M., & Rahmat, N. (2018). Peningkatan profesionalisme guru melalui inovasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v3i2.348

Nurqomah, R. (2021). Kompetensi profesionalisme guru. Aksioma Ad-Diniyah, 9(1), 27–30. https://osf.io/preprints/87rqm/

Pitriani, A. (2022). Konsep profesionalisme keguruan. Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah. https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/8svf5

Risdiany, H. (2021). Pengembangan profesionalisme guru dalam. Seminar Nasional Ilmu, 3(2), 197. https://prosiding.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/snip/article

Rozak, A. (2021). Kebijakan pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(February), 2021. doi:10.51275/alim.v3i2.218

Sepriyanti, N. (2012). Guru profesional adalah kunci mewujudkan pendidikan berkualitas. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 19(1), 66–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.15548/jt.v19i1.8

Soeprapto, S. (2013). Landasan aksiologis sistem pendidikan nasional Indonesia dalam perspektif filsafat pendidikan. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 32(2), 266–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/cp.v0i2.1485

Supendi, P. (2016). Variasi (format) sistem pendidikan di Indonesia. Almufida, 1(1), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.46576/almufida.v1i1.110

Vhalery, R., Setyastanto, A. M., & Leksono, A. W. (2022). Kurikulum merdeka belajar kampus merdeka: Sebuah kajian literatur. Research and Development Journal of Education, 8(1), 185. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v8i1.11718

Wuryanto, H., & Abduh, M. (2022). Mengkaji kembali hasil PISA sebagai pendekatan inovasi pembelajaran untuk peningkatan kompetensi literasi dan nurmensi. https://gurudikdas.kemdikbud.go.id/news/mengkaji-kembali-hasil-pisa-sebagai-pendekatan-inovasi-pembelajaran--untuk-peningkatan-kompetensi-li, diakses pada 7 Mei 2024.

Yunardi, Y. (2014). Sistem pendidikan di Thailand. Kantor Atase Pendidikan, Kedutaan Besar Republik Indonesia (KBRI) Bangkok. atdikbudbangkok.org.

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

Mighfar, S., Dilfam Aldisya Ervani, Nazilatul Faizah, Anavee Khoona, & Ainun Nisa. (2024). Studi Perbandingan Kompetensi Profesional Guru Indonesia dan Thailand. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(4), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v2i4.3251