The Effect Of Edmodo On Students’ Willinngness To Communicate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v1i4.1562Keywords:
Edmodo, Willingness to Communicate (WTC), TechnologyAbstract
Penelitian ini menekankan pada penggunaan edmodo sebagai salah satu bentuk aktifitas pembelajaran bahasa berbasis komputer (CALL activity), menginvestigasi pengaruhnya terhadap keinginan berkomunikasi (willingness to communicate/WTC dalam belajar bahasa inggris. Tujuan penelitian ini ada dua, satu sisi penelitian ini mencoba untuk menguji pengaruh edmodo terhadap keinginan siswa berkomunikasi (students’WTC) dan disisi lain penelitian ini mencoba untuk menemukan aktifitas-aktifitas pembelajaran yang terbaik yang dapat mempengarui keinginan siswa berkomunikasi (students’ WTC). Jumlah total partispan meliputi 27 siswa SMKN 4 Kendari. Dalam pengambilan sample, peneliti menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Instrument pengumpulan data terdiri atas close dan open ended kuesioner. Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode campuran. Data kuantitatif berasal dari close ended kuesioner, sementara open ended kuesioner digunakan sebagai data kualitatif. Paired sample t - test digunakan untuk mencari pengaruh edmodo terhadap keinginan siswa berkomunikasi (students'WTC). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada pengaruh yang signifikan edmodo terhadap keinginan siswa berkomunikasi (students'WTC sebelum dan sesudah dilakukan perlakuan. Hal ini berbeda dengan hasil open ended kuesioner yang menunjukkan bahwa edmodo dapat memberikan pengaruh yang positif terhadap keinginan mereka berkomunikasi. Perbedaan hasil ini dipengaruh oleh beberapa faktor yaitu persepsi siswa terhadap edmodo, teknologi, karakteristik keterampilan bahasa dan rancangan kegiatan pembelajaran.
References
Ahmadi, H. S., Ansarifar, A., & Ansarifar, M. (2015). Exploring the Relationship between Willingness to Communicate in English, and Social/Cultural Capital among Iranian Undergraduate English Majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 413.
Alberth (2011). Critical success factors in online language learning. TEFLIN Journal, 22(1), 16-33.
Alberth. (2013). Technology-enhanced Teaching: A revolutionary Approach to Teaching English as a Foreign Language. TEFLIN, 24(1)
Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: challenges and perspectives. Research in Learning Technology, 18(1).
Alemi, M., Tajeddin, Z., & Mesbah, Z. (2013). Willingness to communicate in L2 English: Impact of learner variables. Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 42-61.
Al-Hammody, A. (2014). When a Facebook Group Makes a Difference: Facebook for Language Learning. ELTWorldOnline. com April 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2015.
Al-Haq, Fawwas Al-Abed & Mahmoud, Ali. (2010). The Effect of s Web-Based Writing Instructional EFL Program on Enhancing the Performance of Jordianian Secondary Students. The JALT Call Journal. 6(3) p. 189-218.
Al-Kathiri, F. (2014). Beyond the Classroom Walls: Edmodo in Saudi Secondary School EFL Instruction, Attitudes and Challenges. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 189.
Al-Maini, Y. H. (2013). Issues in Integrating Information Technology in Learning and Teaching EFL: The Saudi Experience. The EUROCALL Review, 21(2), 49-55.
Arroyo, C. G. (2011). On-line social networks: innovative ways towards the boost of collaborative language learning. ICT for Language Learning.
Asmalı, M., Bilki, U., & Duban, C. A. (2015). A Comparison of the Turkish and Romanian students' willingness to communicate and its affecting factors in English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(1), 59-74.
Barraclough, R. A., Christophel, D. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1988). Willingness to communicate: A cross‐cultural investigation. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 187-192.
Cheawjindakarn, B., Suwannatthachote, P., & Theeraroungchaisri, A. (2012). Critical Success Factors for Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language teaching, 31(03), 117-135.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language learning, 53(S1), 3-32.
Ellis, R. (2004). 21 Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. The handbook of applied linguistics, 525.
Enriquez, M. A. S. (2014, March). Students’ Perceptions on the Effectiveness of the Use of Edmodo as a Supplementary Tool for Learning. In DLSU Research Congress, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140-147.
Grahl, B. (2013) ‘The media of social media’. Available from http://tristantreadwell.wordpress.com/tag/grahl/ [Accessed 12 May 2014].
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 19-39.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2013). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching 3rd edition. Oxford university press.
Lee, J., & Lee, Y. J. (2012). Development and application of e-learning content for advertising education. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 47, 1-12.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology‐enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487-504.
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564-576.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Proximal and distal influences. In 33rd annual conference of the Canadian association of Applied Linguistics, Halifax, NS, Canada.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paperpresented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, Colorado.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of language and social psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
Matsuoka, R., & Evans, D. R. (2005). Willingness to communicate in the second language. J Nurs Studies NCNJ, 4(1), 3-12.
McCroskey JC, Richmond VP (1987) Willingness to communicate. In: McCroskey JC, Daly JA (eds) Personality and Interpersonal Communication(pp. 129– 156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Mehrgan, K. Willingness to Communicate in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study from a Socio-Affective Perspective.
Mills, K. A., & Chandra, V. (2011). Microblogging as a literacy practice for educational communities. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 35-45.
Mirsane, M., & Khabiri, M. (2016). The Effect of Teaching Communicative Strategy on EFL Learners' Willingness to Communicate. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 399.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581-596.
Ni, H. (2012). The effects of affective factors in SLA and pedagogical implications. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1508.
Ping, N. S., & Maniam, M. (2015). The Effectiveness of Facebook Group Discussions on Writing Performance: A Study in Matriculation College. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 4(1), 30-37.
Riasati, M. J., & Noordin, N. (2011). Antecedents of willingness to communicate: A review of literature. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(2), 74.
Riasati, M. J. (2012). EFL learners’ perception of factors influencing willingness to speak English in language classrooms: A qualitative study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(10), 1287-1297.
Sanders, K. S. S. (2012). An examination of the academic networking site Edmodo on student engagement and responsible learning.
Shams-Abadi, B. B., Ahmadi, S. D., & Mehrdad, A. G. (2015). The Effect of Edmodo on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(2), 88-97.
Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(03), 253-270.
Şener, S. (2014). Turkish ELT students' willingness to communicate in English. ELT Research Journal, 3(2), 91-109.
Türkmen, H. G. (2012, January). Using social networking in EFL classroom in higher education. In The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (Vol. 1, p. 350). " Carol I" National Defence University.
Xie, Q. M. (2011). Willingness to communicate in English among secondary school students in the rural Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambriage: MA, Harvard University Press.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66.
Alberth (2011). Critical success factors in online language learning. TEFLIN Journal, 22(1), 16-33.
Alberth. (2013). Technology-enhanced Teaching: A revolutionary Approach to Teaching English as a Foreign Language. TEFLIN, 24(1)
Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: challenges and perspectives. Research in Learning Technology, 18(1).
Alemi, M., Tajeddin, Z., & Mesbah, Z. (2013). Willingness to communicate in L2 English: Impact of learner variables. Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 42-61.
Al-Hammody, A. (2014). When a Facebook Group Makes a Difference: Facebook for Language Learning. ELTWorldOnline. com April 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2015.
Al-Haq, Fawwas Al-Abed & Mahmoud, Ali. (2010). The Effect of s Web-Based Writing Instructional EFL Program on Enhancing the Performance of Jordianian Secondary Students. The JALT Call Journal. 6(3) p. 189-218.
Al-Kathiri, F. (2014). Beyond the Classroom Walls: Edmodo in Saudi Secondary School EFL Instruction, Attitudes and Challenges. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 189.
Al-Maini, Y. H. (2013). Issues in Integrating Information Technology in Learning and Teaching EFL: The Saudi Experience. The EUROCALL Review, 21(2), 49-55.
Arroyo, C. G. (2011). On-line social networks: innovative ways towards the boost of collaborative language learning. ICT for Language Learning.
Asmalı, M., Bilki, U., & Duban, C. A. (2015). A Comparison of the Turkish and Romanian students' willingness to communicate and its affecting factors in English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(1), 59-74.
Barraclough, R. A., Christophel, D. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1988). Willingness to communicate: A cross‐cultural investigation. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 187-192.
Cheawjindakarn, B., Suwannatthachote, P., & Theeraroungchaisri, A. (2012). Critical Success Factors for Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language teaching, 31(03), 117-135.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language learning, 53(S1), 3-32.
Ellis, R. (2004). 21 Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. The handbook of applied linguistics, 525.
Enriquez, M. A. S. (2014, March). Students’ Perceptions on the Effectiveness of the Use of Edmodo as a Supplementary Tool for Learning. In DLSU Research Congress, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140-147.
Grahl, B. (2013) ‘The media of social media’. Available from http://tristantreadwell.wordpress.com/tag/grahl/ [Accessed 12 May 2014].
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 19-39.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2013). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching 3rd edition. Oxford university press.
Lee, J., & Lee, Y. J. (2012). Development and application of e-learning content for advertising education. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 47, 1-12.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology‐enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487-504.
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564-576.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Proximal and distal influences. In 33rd annual conference of the Canadian association of Applied Linguistics, Halifax, NS, Canada.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paperpresented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, Colorado.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of language and social psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
Matsuoka, R., & Evans, D. R. (2005). Willingness to communicate in the second language. J Nurs Studies NCNJ, 4(1), 3-12.
McCroskey JC, Richmond VP (1987) Willingness to communicate. In: McCroskey JC, Daly JA (eds) Personality and Interpersonal Communication(pp. 129– 156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Mehrgan, K. Willingness to Communicate in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study from a Socio-Affective Perspective.
Mills, K. A., & Chandra, V. (2011). Microblogging as a literacy practice for educational communities. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 35-45.
Mirsane, M., & Khabiri, M. (2016). The Effect of Teaching Communicative Strategy on EFL Learners' Willingness to Communicate. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 399.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581-596.
Ni, H. (2012). The effects of affective factors in SLA and pedagogical implications. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1508.
Ping, N. S., & Maniam, M. (2015). The Effectiveness of Facebook Group Discussions on Writing Performance: A Study in Matriculation College. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 4(1), 30-37.
Riasati, M. J., & Noordin, N. (2011). Antecedents of willingness to communicate: A review of literature. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(2), 74.
Riasati, M. J. (2012). EFL learners’ perception of factors influencing willingness to speak English in language classrooms: A qualitative study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(10), 1287-1297.
Sanders, K. S. S. (2012). An examination of the academic networking site Edmodo on student engagement and responsible learning.
Shams-Abadi, B. B., Ahmadi, S. D., & Mehrdad, A. G. (2015). The Effect of Edmodo on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(2), 88-97.
Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(03), 253-270.
Şener, S. (2014). Turkish ELT students' willingness to communicate in English. ELT Research Journal, 3(2), 91-109.
Türkmen, H. G. (2012, January). Using social networking in EFL classroom in higher education. In The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (Vol. 1, p. 350). " Carol I" National Defence University.
Xie, Q. M. (2011). Willingness to communicate in English among secondary school students in the rural Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambriage: MA, Harvard University Press.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66.
Downloads
Published
2023-06-12
How to Cite
Siti Rahmawati Kahar. (2023). The Effect Of Edmodo On Students’ Willinngness To Communicate . Journal of Student Research, 1(4), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v1i4.1562
Issue
Section
Articles
