Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencucian Uang dalam Putusan Nomor :1221/Pid.B/2020/PN JKT.SEL

Authors

  • Aldi Raharjo Universitas Tama Jagakarsa
  • Suriadi Bangun Universitas Tama Jagakarsa
  • Hasudungan Sinaga Universitas Tama Jagakarsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v2i5.3359

Keywords:

Crime, fraud, money laundering

Abstract

Fraud and money laundering are two forms of economic crime that harm many parties, both individuals and institutions. In order to combat and eradicate these crimes, law enforcement authorities often face difficulties in securing and recovering assets obtained from illegal activities. Therefore, the use of asset confiscation mechanisms becomes crucial in an effort to restitute victims and recover illicitly obtained funds.This thesis examines the practical legal challenges faced by the legal system in confiscating criminal assets. These include the process of investigation and gathering valid evidence, as well as the challenges of dealing with concealment and diversion of assets by criminals. Limited resources and differences in legal systems between countries are also factors that affect effective asset forfeiture.Next, the author reviews various strategies and policies that can be implemented to improve the efficiency of confiscating criminal assets. The main focus includes increased cooperation between law enforcement agencies, the use of modern technology in asset analysis and tracking, as well as efforts to raise public awareness about the importance of returning illegally obtained assets.Finally, the author presents decision Number: 1221/Pid.B/2020/PN JKT.SEL or a successful case in conducting asset confiscation for fraud and money laundering. These cases provide valuable lessons on effective tactics and strategies in facing the challenges of economic crime.In conclusion, asset forfeiture is an important tool in the fight against fraud and money laundering. Through greater international cooperation, improved legal systems, and the implementation of appropriate strategies, it is hoped that asset recovery efforts related to economic crime can become more successful and have a positive impact on victims and society as a whole.

 

References

Adami Chazawi. (2010). Pelajaran hukum pidana bagian 1. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Andi Hamzah. (2001). Bunga rampai hukum pidana dan acara pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.

Bambang Purnomo. (1994). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.

Boris Tampubolon. (2022). Strategi menangani dan memenangkan perkara pidana di pengadilan. Kencana.

Fitri Wahyuni. (2017). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana di Indonesia. PT Nusantara Persada Utama.

Ivan Yustiavandana, Arman Nevi, & Adiwarman. (2014). Tindak pidana pencucian uang di pasar modal. Ghalia Indonesia.

Juni Sjafrien Jahja. (2012). Melawan money laundering! Mengenal, mencegah, & memberantas tindak pidana pencucian uang. Visimedia.

Leden Marpaung. (1992). Proses penanganan perkara pidana. Sinar Grafika.

M. Yahya Harahap. (2012). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP (penyidikan dan penuntutan) (Edisi ke-2). PT Sinar Grafika.

Moeljatno. (1993). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Moeljatno. (n.d.). KUHP (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana). Bumi Aksara.

P.A.F. Lamintang. (1994). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru.

P.A.F. Lamintang. (1996). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana Indonesia. PT Citra Adityta Bakti.

Pasal 378 KUHP. (n.d.).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2018). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 1221/Pid.B/2020/PN JKT.SEL. (2020).

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mahmudji. (2003). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soerjono Soekanto. (1996). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.

Undang-Undang TPPU (Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang). (n.d.).

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Aldi Raharjo, Suriadi Bangun, & Hasudungan Sinaga. (2024). Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencucian Uang dalam Putusan Nomor :1221/Pid.B/2020/PN JKT.SEL. Journal of Student Research, 2(5), 01–22. https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v2i5.3359