Evaluasi Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran Aktif pada Gedung Administrasi Perusahan Listrik Surabaya

Senna Malik Ibrahim; Jundan Ahsana Muhammad; Kholis Widodo; Mochammad Luqman Ashari

doi:10.55606/jsr.v3i2.3758

Authors

Senna Malik Ibrahim Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya
Jundan Ahsana Muhammad Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya
Kholis Widodo Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya
Mochammad Luqman Ashari Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v3i2.3758

Keywords:

Fire protection system, Fire extinguisher, Fire alarm

Abstract

Fire is one of the serious threats to buildings, especially national vital objects such as Building B Administration Electric Company East Java. Evaluation of the fire protection system, which includes Portable Fire Extinguishers (APAR), hydrant systems, and Fire Alarm Systems (FAS), is important to ensure the readiness and suitability of the devices in dealing with potential fires. This study was conducted through direct observation and comparing the results with international safety standards such as NFPA 10, NFPA 14, and NFPA 72. The evaluation results showed that the level of suitability of APAR was 89%, the hydrant system 72.6%, and FAS 83.66%. Although most elements of the fire protection system have met the standards, improvements are needed, especially in hydrant accessibility, APAR maintenance, and the implementation of fire alarm simulations. This evaluation provides important input to improve operational security and safety at Building B Administration Electric Company East Java..

References

BASRA. (2024, January 10). Ini penyebab 793 kasus kebakaran di Surabaya sepanjang 2023. Kumparan. Retrieved from https://kumparan.com/beritaanaksurabaya/ini-penyebab-793-kasus-kebakaran-di-surabaya-sepanjang-2023-21wMnwmZN6J

Edufire, I. R. T. (2019). NFPA 14 - 2019. Retrieved from www.nfpa.org

Fitriyanti, P. N. Q. (2020). Evaluasi sistem proteksi kebakaran pada bangunan gedung hotel bertingkat. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, 1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.36423/jitsi.v1i1.474

Indonesia, P. (1970). Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1970. Republik Indonesia.

Kepmenakertrans. (1980). Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi No: Per.04/Men/1980 tentang syarat-syarat pemasangan dan pemeliharaan alat pemadam api ringan. Retrieved from http://damkar.depok.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Peraturan-Menteri-Tenaga-Kerja-dan-Transmigrasi-No-Per.04Men1980-Tentang-Syarat-syarat-Pemasangan-dan-Pemeliharaan-Alat-Pemadam-Api-Ringan.pdf

NFPA. (2018). NFPA 10, 2018.

P, V. C. D. A., Fatkhurrozi, B., & Nisworo, S. (2024). Perencanaan sistem fire alarm semi-addressable dan sprinkler pada bangunan gedung Fakultas Teknik 3 Universitas Tidar. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(2), 458–470.

Paś, J., et al. (2022). The analysis of the operational process of a complex fire alarm system used in transport facilities. Building Simulation, 15(4), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0790-y

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2004). Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 63 Tahun 2004 tentang pengamanan obyek vital nasional.

Sandi, M. R. (2023, August 16). Jakarta dilanda 1.122 kebakaran sepanjang tahun 2023. Sindonews.com. Retrieved from https://metro.sindonews.com/read/1176987/170/jakarta-dilanda-1122-kebakaran-sepanjang-tahun-2023-1692130137

SNI. (2000a). SNI 03-1735-2000 Tata cara perencanaan akses bangunan dan akses lingkungan untuk pencegahan bahaya kebakaran pada bangunan gedung. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. Retrieved from https://www.bsn.go.id/

SNI. (2000b). SNI 03-3985-2000.

Soesanto, E., et al. (2023). Peran objek vital nasional dalam pengamanan file dan cyber security pada PT Freeport Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary, 1(2), 477–484.

Standar Nasional Indonesia 180-1. (2022). Alat pemadam api portabel (APAP) - Bagian 1: Syarat mutu.