Pengaruh Motivasi, Kompetensi Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai

Authors

  • Nunung Nurjanah Universitas Galuh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v2i3.2007

Keywords:

Motivation, Competence, Bureaucratic Reform, Employee Performance

Abstract

This research is motivated by problems with the performance of the Education and Culture Office employees who are still not optimal. Many factors influence this performance, three of which are Motivation, Competence and Bureaucratic Reform. Thus, the purpose of this study is to find out and describe the influence of motivation, competence and bureaucratic reform on the performance of employees of the Banjar City Education and Culture Office. The method used is descriptive qualitative with the results of the study showing that work motivation tends to be very high, as well as very high employee performance. Thus, motivation influences employee performance. This means that if motivation increases, it will be followed by an increase in the performance of the Banjar City Education and Culture Office employees. Competence tends to be very high, as well as very high employee performance. Thus, competence affects employee performance. This means that if competence increases, it will be followed by an increase in the performance of the Banjar City Education and Culture Office employees. Bureaucratic reform tends to be very high, as well as very high employee performance. Thus, if bureaucratic reform affects employee performance. This means that if bureaucratic reform increases, it will be followed by an increase in the performance of the Banjar City Education and Culture Office employees. Motivation, competence and work bureaucratic reform tend to be very high, as well as very high employee performance. Thus, motivation, competence and bureaucratic reform affect employee performance. This means that if motivation, competence and bureaucratic reform increase, it will be followed by an increase in the performance of the Banjar City Education and Culture Office employees

References

BUKU
Daryanto.2017. Manajemen Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan. Cetakan 1. Yogyakarta : Gava Media
Griffin, R.W,2017, Management, 11, South-Western: Cengage Learning
Holidin, 2015. Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta : PT.Raja Grafindo Persada
Jauhar. 2013. Pengantar Teorri dan Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta : Prenada Medi.
Klitgaard. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan, Jakarta: PTRajaGrafindo Persada
Mustafa, 2013. Membangun Visi dan Reorientasi Kinerja Aparatur Daerah Menjawab Tantang Masyarakat Indonesia Baru”,
Ndraha, Takiziduhu. 2011. Budaya Organisasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Orborne dan .Gaebler. 2015. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan, cetakan kedua. Jakarta : Penerbit : Bumi Aksara.
Pasolong. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Ghallia Indonesia.
Sarundajang. 2013. Arus Balik Kekuasaan Pusat ke Daerah, Pustaka Sinar harapan, Jakarta.
Schein .2010. Organzational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Taylor, 2017. Social support: a review. The Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology., 1-48. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.013.0009
Terry, George R. 2006. Prinsip-prinsip Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Uno. B. Hamzah. 2010. Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
UNDANG-UNDANG
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2025,
Undang-undang Bab I No 25 Tahun 2009 tentang pelayanan publik
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan
Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan,
Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 1999 tentang penilaian pelaksanaan pekerjaan PNS

Downloads

Published

2023-08-23

How to Cite

Nunung Nurjanah. (2023). Pengaruh Motivasi, Kompetensi Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 2(3), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v2i3.2007