Analisis Metode SAW-WP-TOPSIS Dan Borda Count Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supervisor

Authors

  • Priyandini Pramithasari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur
  • Prisa Marga Kusumantara Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur
  • Seftin Fitri Ana Wati Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v3i2.2689

Keywords:

DSS, SAW, WP, TOPSIS, Hamming Distance

Abstract

A supervisor is a person who is responsible or has the authority to regulate the procedures for carrying out tasks in a company. The supervisor is the expert of all experts. Due to the important role of a supervisor, the selection of a supervisor must be appropriate, this can sometimes be a problem, if there are many candidates with the same abilities. To solve this problem, a Decision Support System (DSS) approach is used. The criteria used are: age, length of work, performance and absenteeism. This research uses 4 SPK methods, namely the SAW, WP, TOPSIS and borda count methods. Of the four methods, we will compare which method is more relevant for solving this problem using the Hamming Distance method. The results of this research show that the WP method is the most relevant method with the smallest percentage, namely, 47.15%, which means the WP method has the smallest level of nonconformity compared to the other 3 methods, namely SAW 56.81%, TOPSIS 82.95% and borda count 52.72%.

References

Frieyadie, F. (2016). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weight (Saw) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Kenaikan Jabatan. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 12(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.33480/pilar.v12i1.257

Hafiz, A., & Ma’mur, M. (2018). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN KARYAWAN TERBAIK DENGAN PENDEKATAN WEIGHTED PRODUCT. XV(April), 23–28.

Kanim, Tukiyat, & Murni Handayani. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Metode Technique for Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution, Simple Additive Weighting Dan Weighted Product Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik. JSiI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 10(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsii.v10i1.6134

Kusumantara, P. M., Kustyani, M., & Ayu, T. (2019). Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Wedding Organizer Di. Teknika Engineering and Sains Journal, 3(I), 19–24.

Larasati, F. B., Solikhun, Saputra, W., Dewi, R., & Andani, S. R. (2021). Analisis Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Penerapan Metode AHP dan SAW Seleksi Ketua Komunitas Himpunan Mahasiswa Menulis. Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Teknologi Informasi (SENSASI), 636–640. http://seminar-id.com/prosiding/index.php/sensasi/article/view/690/654

Downloads

Published

2024-01-16

How to Cite

Priyandini Pramithasari, Prisa Marga Kusumantara, & Seftin Fitri Ana Wati. (2024). Analisis Metode SAW-WP-TOPSIS Dan Borda Count Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supervisor. Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 3(2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v3i2.2689