ANALISIS PERBEDAAN KADAR β-KAROTEN PADA UBI JALAR KUNING (Ipomoea batatas L.) MENTAH DAN REBUS DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SPEKTROFOTOMETRI UV-VIS

Authors

  • Cut Bidara Panita Umar Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Maluku Husada
  • Jamila F Kabakoran Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Maluku Husada
  • Dewi Sukma Hukom Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Maluku Husada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/klinik.v1i2.1161

Keywords:

Yellow sweet potato, β-carotene, UV-Vis Spectrophotometry

Abstract

Sweet potato is a good food ingredient, because of its starch which has a very rich nutritional content, including high carbohydrates. Therefore, in some areas sweet potato is also used as a staple food. It also contains protein, vitamin C and is rich in vitamin A (β-carotene). β-carotene in yellow sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) can function to meet the needs of vitamin A and as an antioxidant in reducing the effects of free radicals. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in β-carotene levels in raw and boiled yellow sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) using the UV-Vis spectrophotometry method. Samples of yellow sweet potato were extracted by using maceration method with 95% ethanol solvent. Then a quantitative analysis was performed using the UV-Vis spectrophotometry method at a wavelength of 450 nm and a linear regression equation was obtained y = 0.0237x + 0.395 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9931 and an average level of β-carotene in raw yellow sweet potato was obtained of 1278 .23 mg/kg and boiled yellow sweet potato of 413.90 mg/kg. So from this study it can be concluded that the levels of β-carotene in raw yellow sweet potatoes are greater than boiled yellow sweet potatoes because some boiled yellow sweet potatoes have been damaged due to heat or dissolved / lost to water.

References

Aira Hafnizar., Rosmayati., Nini Rahmawati., (2018). Kandungan β-Karoten Pada Beberapa Aksesi Ubi Jalar (Ipomoea Batatas L.) Di Kecamatan Lembah Seulawah Kabupaten Aceh Besar..
Aisiyah, Ln., Ninik R., (2017). Kandungan β-Karoten, Protein, Kalsium, Dan Uji Kesukaan Crackers Dengan Substitusi Tepung Ubi Jalar Kuning (Ipomoea Batatas L.) Dan Ikan Teri Nasi Untuk Anak Kep Dan Kva. Journal Of Nutrition College Vol.2.No.1.Th.2013.Hal145- 153.
Kuniawan, Kiki Wahyu. 2017. Aktivitas Antioksidan dan Organooleptik The Daun Kelor Kombinasi Daun Jambu Biji dengan Variasi Suhu Pengeringan Serta Penambahan Jahe. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Produksi Ubi Jalar Indonesia Tahun 2015.Jakarta.
Dra. Wisnawati, 2021. Produksi Makanan Dan Minuman Herbal. PT Media Nusa Creative.
Ervinda N., Ira., (2016). Kajian Subtitusi Tepung Terigu Dan Tepung Ubi Jalar Ungu Berkadar Pati Resisten Tinggi Terhadap Kualitas Muffin. (Skripsi). Universitas Bandar Lampung.71 Hlm.
Fitriah Fauziah., Roslinda Rasyid., Reza Fadhlany., ( 2015). Pengaruh Proses Pengolahan Terhadap Kadar β-karoten Pada Ubi Jalar Varietas Ungu (Ipomoea Batatas L. Lam) Dengan Metode Spektrofotometri Visibel. Jurnal Farmasi Higea, Vol.7,No.2.
Purwanti A., Putri MEVE., Dan Alviati N., (2019). Optimasi Ekstraksi β-Karoten Ubi Jalar Kuning (Ipomoea Batatas L.) Sebagai Sumber Potensial Pigmen Alami. Prosiding Nasional Rekayasa Teknologi Industri Dan Informasi XIV Tahun 2019 (RETII). 414-419.
Suhartati, Tati. (2017). Dasar-dasar Spektrofotometri UV-Vis dan Spektrometri Massa untuk Penentuan Struktur Senyawa Organik. Bandar Lampung: AURA - Anugrah Utama Raharja
Saidel V., 2018. Laboratory Chromatography guide. Buchi laboratechnik AG. Switzerland.
Tjatur Prijo Rahardjo., Edy Kustiani., (2019). Pengaruh Pupuk Nitrogen Dan Klon Ubi Jalar Terhadap Sifat Fisis Dan Khemis Ubi Segar Selama Penyimpanan. Jurnal AGRINIKA Vol.3 No.2.47-94.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-24

How to Cite

Cut Bidara Panita Umar, Jamila F Kabakoran, & Dewi Sukma Hukom. (2022). ANALISIS PERBEDAAN KADAR β-KAROTEN PADA UBI JALAR KUNING (Ipomoea batatas L.) MENTAH DAN REBUS DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SPEKTROFOTOMETRI UV-VIS. Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 1(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.55606/klinik.v1i2.1161