Manajemen Evaluasi Kinerja Di Lembaga Bahasa LIA Cibinong: Perspektif Penulis

Authors

  • Rhinomuraena Murtoaji Abikusno Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia ASMI
  • Sri Sundari Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia ASMI
  • Marisi Pakpahan Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia ASMI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/makreju.v2i1.2615

Keywords:

Performance evaluation, performance evaluation management, LIA Cibinong Language Institute

Abstract

This article discusses the performance evaluation process at the LIA Cibinong Language Institute, which is a crucial step in measuring and assessing employee performance. This process is essential to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of organizational operations, while providing feedback that supports overall performance improvement. LIA Cibinong, as an educational entity, considers performance evaluation management important in monitoring employee achievements. The evaluation process at LIA Cibinong consists of planning, implementation, assessment, and follow-up. The planning stage establishes the objectives of the performance evaluation in line with the objectives of the organization, with criteria that include quantity, quality, timeliness, and collaboration. Implementation involves collecting performance data through self-assessment, supervisors, and colleagues. The assessment stage uses techniques such as rating scales, comparisons, and free assessments, tailored to the evaluation criteria. Ultimately, the follow-up stage uses the assessment results as feedback, not just evaluation, but as a guide to improving employee performance. Careful implementation of performance evaluation by LIA Cibinong ensures that employees contribute optimally in accordance with the vision and mission of the organization. This process is not only an evaluative instrument, but also a foundation for individual development and overall institutional performance improvement.

References

Abdullah, M. (2014). Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan. IDR UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.https://idr.uinantasari.ac.id/5011/1/Manajemen%20dan%20Evaluasi%20Kinerja.pdf

Almohtaseb, A. a., Shaheen, H. A. K., & Almahameed, M. (2017, June). The Impact of Performance Management System on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Balance Scorecard Usage. ResearchGate, 6(2), 681-691. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320197607_The_Impact_of_Performance_Management_System_on_Employee_Performance_The_Moderating_Role_of_Balance_Scorecard_Usage

Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidelines. KoganPage.http://www.untagsmd.ac.id/files/Perpustakaan_Digital_2/PERFORMANCE%20MANAGEMENT%20Performance%20Management%20%20Key%20Strategies%20and%20Practical%20Guidelines,%202nd%20Edit.pdf

Capelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2016, October). Evaluating Performance: How to Appraise, Promote, and Fire by Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolution

Cokins, G. (2009). Performance Management: Integrating Strategy Execution, Methodologies, Risk,andAnalytics.Wiley.https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Performance_Management/sZoAadlSfaoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

Fikri, M. (2023, April 1). Evaluasi Kinerja Manajemen Strategi Pemasaran Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Pada AMIK Bina Sriwijaya Palembang. Indo-Fintech Intellectuals: Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.54373/ifijeb.v3i1.126

Manajemen Evaluasi Diri Dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. (2023, February 1). Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 10(1), 105-116. http://dx.doi.org/. 10.25157/jwp.v10i1.9813

Panto, C., & Rahman, S. (2021, April). Evaluasi Kinerja Manajemen BAZNAS Kota Gorontalo dengan Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Idarotuna: Jurnal Kajian Manajemen Dakwah, 3(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/idarotuna.v3i2.11962

Pulakos, E. D. (2009). Performance Management: A New Approach for Driving Business Results. Wiley. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Performance_Management/Rw2qrpJhpdsC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

Pulliam Phillips, P. (2017). Bottomline on ROI - 3rd Edition - Softcover: Benefits and Barriers to Measuring Learning, Performance Improvement, and Human Resources Programs). Organization Design & Development, Incorporated. https://roiinstitute.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/The-Bottomline-on-ROI-3rd-ed.pdf

Riana, D. (2021, April). Evaluasi Kinerja Manajemen dan Keuangan Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Tahun Anggaran 2014-2018. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen dan Bisnis (JAMB), 1(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4697478

Smither, J. W., & London, M. (2009). Performance Management: Putting Research Into Action (J. W. Smither & M. London, Eds.). Wiley. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Performance_Management/4WHHDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

Tagatari, Y. V. (2018). Evaluasi Kinerja Sistem Informasi Manajemen Operasional Pelabuhan Menggunakan COBIT 5 pada PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia II (Persero) Cabang Panjang, Lampung. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Evaluasi-Kinerja-Sistem-Informasi-Manajemen-COBIT-5-Tagatari/ab3e671f0b5c46bd55bc66cc322ad23323bc72d0#citing-papers

UIN Malang. (2020). Metode Pengumpulan Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Metode-Pengumpulan-Data-Penelitian-Kualitatif-Metodologi-PPs/eb772d5be3c6adcadab032761c08e3783c14831f

Downloads

Published

2024-01-05

How to Cite

Rhinomuraena Murtoaji Abikusno, Sri Sundari, & Marisi Pakpahan. (2024). Manajemen Evaluasi Kinerja Di Lembaga Bahasa LIA Cibinong: Perspektif Penulis. Manajemen Kreatif Jurnal, 2(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.55606/makreju.v2i1.2615